This scene seems to show Griffin pulling
the Phoenix fully from her naïveté and innocence in the garden. There she was
entranced by everything around her and clearly knew practically nothing about
Earth. It could be argued that the scene “All of the Lights” portrays her
shedding that initial innocence and being shown everything from fairly ordinary
pleasures (such as fireworks) to some of the evil in this world (in the form of
the KKK) to her own apparent sexual awakening. It follows, then, that this
scene with the teacup may be interpreted as her being shown that now that she
has some knowledge of the ways of the world, she has to conform to some of the
rules of the society that governs it.
The black panelled wall behind her and the
vignette style lighting of the scene are suggestive of a stage and could indicate
that she is learning to put on a façade or to act in a way that would not come
naturally to her. The objects on the table (which include multiple white
candles, gold and white porcelain, and a bowl of roses) all display, to some
extent, how man controls his environment. The candle flames are smaller,
controlled versions of the explosion that the Phoenix caused when she came to
Earth. They might represent any rebellious or wild facets of her nature that
are now being pulled into line by Griffin. The porcelain represents society;
seemingly beautiful, yet cold and unforgiving. There is only one correct way to
use the porcelain, as shown by her attempts with the teacup, and similarly,
society is portrayed as having only one correct way for a person to fit in.
Finally, the bowl of roses signifies man’s dominion over nature; he decides
what parts of it are beautiful or useful and discards all of the rest.
The physical placement of the characters in
this scene also communicates control to the audience. The Phoenix is perched on
her gilt chair and seems to be uncomfortable or ill at ease in her surroundings
– she constantly twitches and flinches when handling the teacup and offers unsure
glances and smiles to Griffin. He, on the other hand, stands stony-faced behind
the other gilt chair and is not seen for the majority of the scene. It appears
that he does not move either to leave or to offer help to the Phoenix. The
difference in their levels and the Phoenix’s constant deference to Griffin is a
clear indicator of where the power lies in their relationship.
The lesson being taught to the Phoenix in
this scene is clearly learnt before the start of the next as her demeanour has
changed entirely between the two; she enters the banquet wearing (man-made)
jewellery and shoes, exuding confidence and sits like a regular person rather
than in the crouching position of the previous scene. Despite this, her
feathers cannot be hidden and it is this aspect, rather than her acquired “humanity”
that everyone notices. In this way, it is shown that one’s inner self can never
be entirely hidden.
I never thought of the teacup scene as being a stage. That is a really fascinating concept. It does seem to portray some sort of play, both in the terms literal meaning and a more deeper metaphorical sense. The phoenix is both toying with our Earthly/human nature, but it somehow feels like a false pantomime of humanity.
ReplyDeleteYou should consider furthering this argument for the media analysis assignment.